SARFT May Upgrade “Bail Order” to Lifetime Ban

After the “ban on the bad” policy was promulgated, all parties became very cautious, and the entertainment industry also had a new topic that was worth exploring: how to prevent fire and prevent “unworthy” artists? Signing ethical terms, paid instalments, and performing physical exams like sports athletes are not easy to implement! In fact, it is not China's characteristics to seal off “unfavorable artists”. In order to clear the industry, South Korea and the United States have their own tricks. On April 1st, the Spring Beijing TV Show was held in Beijing. As the first TV festival after the implementation of "One Theatre Two Stars", the policy's butterfly effect was highlighted at the trade fair. The "ban on the bad" policy has also become a hot spot. You Xiaogang, president of the China Television Production Industry Association, revealed at the trade fair that SARFT is considering amending the "injunction" of bad artists, and bad artists may be banned for life.

1, SARFT revised "banned order"?

On September 29, 2014, the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television officially issued a notice to “block the artists who had made bad marks”. The “drug abuse” and “cockroach” behaviors were clearly named, and moral issues such as derailment were not mentioned. In addition to the television drama works mentioned above, movies, television programs, online dramas, micro movies, etc., which were produced by "bad actors" were required to be suspended.

"Bad Artists" Terms and Conditions into the Contract

"I know who is a 'safe' artist and can't follow the physical examination every day?" The first time the director Chen Jianbin became a writer. It now appears that this is really necessary.

At this year's TV Spring Fair, the policy of "unfamous artists" became a hot spot. It is reported that a certain team stipulates that the actor can only enter the crew before the urine. Wang Hui, who served as the director of the Tang Dynasty film and television industry, revealed that after the “improper artist” policy was introduced, the crew of the crew were very cautious. Even TV stations shot their hands, and the bad artists were included in the contract as terms. The reason was that the drama could not be broadcast. The damage caused was caused by the producer and the buyer did not bear the loss.

"Bad Artists" is forbidden for life?

In the ban on impaired orders, movies and TV dramas involving bad artists appear to be suspended. However, if it is necessary to add a time limit to this “suspended broadcast,” I hope that... Anyway, the “notice” does Did not mention.

Yao Di, an actress who had been low-keyed for a long time because of an article scandal, appeared in many episodes as a leading character at the trade fair. It seemed to be a brewing "return." In addition, the “drug-related” actor Wang Xuebing appeared on the starring list of the TV drama “Detention Center”. It is reported that the drama has entered the post-production. As for whether Wang Xuebing’s incident will affect the drama, the relevant propaganda personnel indicated that they must wait for the notice. From this point of view, "worse artists" can still "resurrect" as long as they choose the right time.

The State Administration of Radio, Film and Television issued a notice to “destroy unscrupulous artists”. You Xiaogang revealed that the General Administration of China is studying whether to amend it. “I think that if we want to punish bad artists, let him stop for 10 years, or even ban for life. In the United States, the actors The problem will not be used for him, and it will not forbid the release of the whole movie."

"Ban ban" a bird of nine lives, who should lose

After the promulgation of the “Bail Order”, the film and television industry was no less affected. In addition to the artists themselves being hit hard, the film and television dramas that were filmed also suffered from snow traps and formed a chain reaction. Whether the losses caused by the “bad artists” should be borne by the actors themselves or by the producers and other parties should be the focus of hot discussion.

While calling for amendments to the prohibition order, the film and television people tried their best to prevent and reduce the losses caused by the "bad artists." Today, the SARFT may either revise the “ban on the bad” or give investors, producers, publishers, etc. more hope.

Now when the crew uses actors, they will also add one item to the performance contract: if the entire drama is affected due to the personal reasons of the actors, the actor will bear the responsibility and be punished. However, this clause is very difficult to implement. There is a tens of millions of plays. How can an actor lose money?

2. South Korea: Performing Arts Management Association has the right to kill

The “zero tolerance” for bad artists is even worse in Korea where the entertainment industry is more developed.

"zero tolerance"

Korean society has a high demand for entertainers, and the self-discipline of artists is correspondingly strong. But even so, there have been two large-scale artistes involved in the poisonous storm.

According to information released by the Korean Ministry of Culture, 54 artists such as Yoon Hyun-soo and Lee Chang-hee in 1975 had caused turmoil in the performing arts sector because of their involvement in the marijuana storm. Among them, 20 were detained. Furthermore, in 1987, the full-hearted right of “wild chrysanthemum” and “resurrection” of Li Chengzhe and Gao Jinxian were detained on suspicion of smoking marijuana, resulting in the dissolution of the then South Korean rock music leader “wild chrysanthemum” and “resurrection”. Since then, Korean artists have been involved in drug-related incidents.

In order to deal with the ills of entertainers’ drug-related diseases, Korean society has gradually established corresponding institutional constraints. Once artistes are involved in drugs, they will not only be sanctioned by the law, but will also face pressure from the South Korean performing arts industry associations and television stations, which will directly affect the star of the drug-related artists.

Korean performing arts companies and the public are quite harsh on drug addicts under this system, creating a zero-tolerance atmosphere for artists.

Double block

In South Korea, the reputation of the industry associations of Korean performing arts is extremely high. After investigation, the association can punish drug addicts with mild warnings, heavy punishments, and even permanent punishments to achieve a deterrent effect. In order to allow drug-related artists to reflect on better self-discipline, drug-related artists often have to be blocked by television stations for a period of time. It is noteworthy that there is no specific time for this, but it has considerable deterrent power for artists.

Because the Korean drama production model has undergone a transition from “combination of production and broadcasting” (production and broadcast of TV stations monopolizing TV dramas) to “separation of production and broadcasting” (the production and playback of TV dramas is completed by different subjects), but it holds the play and preparation of television dramas. Right TV stations still occupy a dominant position. Moreover, advertisements for artist endorsements also need to be broadcast by television stations. If they are banned, drug-related artists will block their way to the world and suffer heavy economic losses.

3, the United States stop loss strategy: rely on insurance companies to fight drugs

In the United States, the U.S. public hates the stars of drug addiction. Therefore, once a celebrity star is exposed to a drug abuse scandal, it will not only be disreputable, but will also be labeled as “fallen”. Relatively speaking, Hollywood has few films affected by celebrity drugs. Even the badly celebrities became law-breaking during the filming period, and movie insurance companies played an important role.

Hollywood movies are a high-investment, high-risk industry. The celebrity drug addiction poses more risks. The huge hedging demand also creates a strong movie insurance company. Most producers will only make films if they have insurance. The star is naturally the key insured object. If the star causes losses to the film and television company due to its own problems such as drug addiction, the insurance company will refuse to provide insurance for the star. The star's career in Hollywood will be in jeopardy.

Robert Downey, the "Iron Man," who became young and famous, once fell into the point where most film companies did not dare to look for him to film. The director Woody Allen’s 2000 work “Two-faced Marinda” once wanted to invite him to participate in the show but could not come true. The main reason was that insurance companies were reluctant to underwrite.

Arts And Crafts Casting

Arts And Crafts Casting,Hpdc Die Casting,Aluminum Die Casting Air,Die Casting Aluminium Alloys

Dongguan Metalwork Technology Co., LTD. , https://www.dgdiecastpro.com